4.1 Article

TP53 gene expression, codon 72 polymorphism and human papillomavirus DNA associated with pterygium

期刊

GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 1251-1258

出版社

FUNPEC-EDITORA
DOI: 10.4238/vol7-4gmr528

关键词

Pterygia; Brazilian; Ophthalmology

资金

  1. Universidade Catolica de Goias, Goiania, GO, Brazil (UCG/PROPE/MGene)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pterygium is a disease of unknown origin and pathogenesis that can be vision threatening. Several researchers believe that pterygium is UV-related and that abnormal expression of p53 protein and infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) are risk factors for pterygium, but their experiments have been inconclusive. We investigated its relation with p53 protein expression, p53 gene codon 72 polymorphism and infection with HPV DNA. Pterygial samples were obtained from 36 patients; 21 normal conjunctival samples were used as controls. Expression of p53 protein was studied by immunohistochemistry, using the antibody DO-7. Analysis for the p53 genotype was made by polymerase chain reaction, using specific primers for the arginine and proline alleles, and an analysis for HPV was made of the pterygium patients and control group. Fourteen of the 36 pterygial specimens were positive for abnormal p53 expression. Thirty-one of the patients were heterozygotic and three were homozygotic for the proline allele; two were homozygotic for the arginine allele; in the control group 12 of 21 were heterozygotic and seven of these 21 were homozygotic for the proline allele; two were homozygotic for the arginine allele. Twenty-one of the pterygium patients were positive for HPV; HPV type 1 was found in nine of these, type 2 in seven and both types in five. Only two of the 21 controls had HPV; both had type 16. We suggest that abnormal expression of p53, p53 codon 72 polymorphisms and HPV DNA are required co-factors for the development of pterygium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据