4.2 Article

Human aging and somatic point mutations in mtDNA: A comparative study of generational differences (grandparents and grandchildren)

期刊

GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 34, 期 1, 页码 31-U190

出版社

SOC BRASIL GENETICA
DOI: 10.1590/S1415-47572010005000106

关键词

aging; mtDNA; mitochondrial somatic mutations

资金

  1. RENOR/CAPES (Rede Norte para Formacao e Fixacao de Grupos de Docentes Pesquisadores na Amazonia)
  2. Milenio/CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico)
  3. FINEP (Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos)
  4. UFPA (Universidade Federal do Para)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The accumulation of somatic mutations in mtDNA is correlated with aging. In this work, we sought to identify somatic mutations in the HVS-1 region (D-loop) of mtDNA that might be associated with aging. For this, we compared 31 grandmothers (mean age: 63 +/- 2.3 years) and their 62 grandchildren (mean age: 15 +/- 4.1 years), the offspring of their daughters. Direct DNA sequencing showed that mutations absent in the grandchildren were detected in a presumably homoplasmic state in three grandmothers and in a heteroplasmic state in an additional 13 grandmothers; no mutations were detected in the remaining 15 grandmothers. However, cloning followed by DNA sequencing in 12 grandmothers confirmed homoplasia in only one of the three mutations previously considered to be homoplasmic and did not confirm heteroplasmy in three out of nine grandmothers found to be heteroplasmic by direct sequencing. Thus, of 12 grandmothers in whom mtDNA was analyzed by cloning, eight were heteroplasmic for mutations not detected in their grandchildren. In this study, the use of genetically related subjects allowed us to demonstrate the occurrence of age-related (> 60 years old) mutations (homoplasia and heteroplasmy). It is possible that both of these situations (homoplasia and heteroplasmy) were a long-term consequence of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation that can lead to the accumulation of mtDNA mutations throughout life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据