4.4 Article

Improving the Accuracy and Efficiency of Identity-by-Descent Detection in Population Data

期刊

GENETICS
卷 194, 期 2, 页码 459-+

出版社

GENETICS SOC AM
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.113.150029

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  2. Wellcome Trust [076113, 085475]
  3. National Institutes of Health [HG004960, HG005701, GM099568, GM075091]
  4. Broad Institute
  5. University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA)
  6. University of Oulu
  7. National Institute for Health and Welfare in Finland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Segments of indentity-by-descent (IBD) detected from high-density genetic data are useful for many applications, including long-range phase determination, phasing family data, imputation, IBD mapping, and heritability analysis in founder populations. We present Refined IBD, a new method for IBD segment detection. Refined IBD achieves both computational efficiency and highly accurate IBD segment reporting by searching for IBD in two steps. The first step (identification) uses the GERMLINE algorithm to find shared haplotypes exceeding a length threshold. The second step (refinement) evaluates candidate segments with a probabilistic approach to assess the evidence for IBD. Like GERMLINE, Refined IBD allows for IBD reporting on a haplotype level, which facilitates determination of multi-individual IBD and allows for haplotype-based downstream analyses. To investigate the properties of Refined IBD, we simulate SNP data from a model with recent superexponential population growth that is designed to match United Kingdom data. The simulation results show that Refined IBD achieves a better power/accuracy profile than fastIBD or GERMLINE. We find that a single run of Refined IBD achieves greater power than 10 runs of fastIBD. We also apply Refined IBD to SNP data for samples from the United Kingdom and from Northern Finland and describe the IBD sharing in these data sets. Refined IBD is powerful, highly accurate, and easy to use and is implemented in Beagle version 4.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据