4.4 Article

Allelic Diversity and Its Implications for the Rate of Adaptation

期刊

GENETICS
卷 195, 期 4, 页码 1373-+

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.113.158410

关键词

number of alleles; gene diversity; heterozygosity; response to selection; selection limits; diffusion approximations

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia [CGL2011-25096, CGL2012-39861-C02]
  2. Xunta de Galicia [10PXIB 310044PR]
  3. Xunta de Galicia (Grupos de Referencia Competitiva) [2010/80]
  4. Fondos Feder: Unha maneira de facer Europa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genetic variation is usually estimated empirically from statistics based on population gene frequencies, but alternative statistics based on allelic diversity (number of allelic types) can provide complementary information. There is a lack of knowledge, however, on the evolutionary implications attached to allelic-diversity measures, particularly in structured populations. In this article we simulated multiple scenarios of single and structured populations in which a quantitative trait subject to stabilizing selection is adapted to different fitness optima. By forcing a global change in the optima we evaluated which diversity variables are more strongly correlated with both short- and long-term adaptation to the new optima. We found that quantitative genetic variance components for the trait and gene-frequency-diversity measures are generally more strongly correlated with short-term response to selection, whereas allelic-diversity measures are more correlated with long-term and total response to selection. Thus, allelic-diversity variables are better predictors of long-term adaptation than gene-frequency variables. This observation is also extended to unlinked neutral markers as a result of the information they convey on the demographic population history. Diffusion approximations for the allelic-diversity measures in a finite island model under the infinite-allele neutral mutation model are also provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据