4.4 Article

The Dot1 Histone Methyltransferase and the Rad9 Checkpoint Adaptor Contribute to Cohesin-Dependent Double-Strand Break Repair by Sister Chromatid Recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

期刊

GENETICS
卷 182, 期 2, 页码 437-446

出版社

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.109.101899

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education and Science of Spain [BFU2006-05260, BFU2005-00955, BFU20084-1014]
  2. Junta de Andalucia [CV1624]
  3. Junta de Castilla y Leon [CS105A07]
  4. Medical Research council of the United Kingdom
  5. MRC [MC_U120074328] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Medical Research Council [MC_U120074328] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genomic integrity is threatened by multiple Sources of DNA damage. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most dangerous types of DNA lesions and can be generated by endogenous or exogenous agents, but they can arise also during DNA replication. Sister chromatid recombination (SCR) is a key mechanism for the repair of DSBs generated during replication and it is fundamental for maintaining genomic stability. Proper repair relies oil several factors, among which histone modifications play important roles in the response to DSBs. Here, we study the role of the histone H3K79 methyltransferase Dot1 in the repair by SCR of replication-dependent. HO-induced DSBs, as a way to assess its function in homologous recombination. We show that DOLI, the Rad9 DNA damage checkpoint adaptor, and phosphorylation of histone H2A (gamma H2A) are required for efficient SCR. Moreover, we show that Dot1 and Rad9 promote DSB-induced loading of cohesin onto chromatin. We propose that recruitment of Rad9 to DSB sites mediated by gamma H2A and H3K79 methylation contributes to DSB repair via SCR by regulating cohesin binding to damage sites. Therefore, our results contribute to all understanding of how different chromatin modifications impinge on DNA repair mechanisms, which are fundamental for maintaining genomic stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据