4.4 Article

ISSR analysis shows low genetic diversity versus high genetic differentiation for giant bamboo, Dendrocalamus giganteus(Poaceae: Bambusoideae), in China populations

期刊

GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION
卷 59, 期 5, 页码 901-908

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10722-011-9732-3

关键词

Dendrocalamus giganteus; Genetic variation; ISSR; Population structure

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31070593]
  2. Applied Basic Research Program of Yunnan Province, China [2010CD141]
  3. State Forestry Administration of China [2008-4-30]
  4. International Centre for Bamboo and Rattan [1632009014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Munro is a high-value woody bamboo widely grown in Southeast Asia and China's Yunnan Province. We investigated its genetic diversity in Yunnan as a prelude to considering effective breeding programs and the protection of germplasm resources. Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers were used to assess the genetic structure and differentiation of seven populations. Seven ISSR primers generated 140 bands, of which 124 were polymorphic (88.57%). Genetic diversity within populations was relatively low, averaging 11.33% polymorphic bands (PPB), while diversity was considerably higher among populations, with PPB = 88.57%. Greater genetic differentiation was detected among populations ( (ST) = 0.8474). We grouped these seven populations into two clusters within an UPGMA dendrogram-one comprised the Xinping and Shiping populations from central Yunnan, the other included the remaining five populations. Mantel tests indicated no significant correlation between genetic and geographic distances among populations. Breeding system characteristics, genetic drift, and limited gene flow ( (m) = 0.0901) might be important factors for explaining this differentiation. Based on the overall high genetic diversity and differentiation among . populations in Yunnan, we suggest the implementation of conservation measures for all populations and sufficient sampling for conservation collections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据