4.4 Article

Genic SSRs for European and North American hop (Humulus lupulus L.)

期刊

GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION
卷 55, 期 7, 页码 959-969

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10722-007-9303-9

关键词

functional SSRs; Humulus lupulus; microsatellite; sequence tagged sites (STS); Simple Sequence Repeats

资金

  1. USDA-ARS [CRIS 5358-150-033-00D]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Eight genic SSR loci were evaluated for genetic diversity assessment and genotype identification in Humulus lupulus L. from Europe and North America. Genetic diversity, as measured by three diversity indices, was significantly lower in European cultivars than in North American wild accessions. Neighbor Joining cluster analysis separated the hop genotypes into European and North American groups. These eight SSRs were useful in uniquely identifying each accession with the exception of two sets of European landraces and a pair of Japanese cultivars, 'Shinshuwase' and 'Kirin II'. An accession from Manitoba grouped with the European (EU) cluster reflecting the group's genetic similarity to older Manitoba germplasm used to develop 'Brewer's Gold' and the gene pool arising from this cultivar. Cultivars grouped closely with one of their immediate parents. 'Perle' grouped with its parent 'Northern Brewer and 'Willamette' grouped with its parent 'Fuggle H'. Wild American accessions were divided into two subgroups: a North Central group containing mostly H. lupulus var. lupuloides and a Southwestern group containing H. lupulus var. neomexicanus accessions. These eight SSRs will be valuable for genotype identification in European and wild American germplasm and may potentially prove useful for marker-assisted selection in hop. PCR products from four previously reported primer pairs that amplify the same intronic SSR regions as do the genic SSRs in this study were compared in eight common cultivars. Different primer pairs generated robust markers at the chs2 and chi loci. However, only the HLC-004B and HLC-006 primer pairs amplified successfully at the chs3 and chs4 loci.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据