4.3 Article

Incorporating Model Uncertainty in Detecting Rare Variants: The Bayesian Risk Index

期刊

GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 35, 期 7, 页码 638-649

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20613

关键词

genetic association studies; Bayesian model uncertainty; Bayes factors; multiplicity correction; sequence analysis; WECARE

资金

  1. NIEHS [R01 ES016813, U01 ES015090]
  2. NHRGI [U01 HG005927]
  3. WECARE Study Collaborative Group [R01 CA097397, U01 CA083178]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We are interested in investigating the involvement of multiple rare variants within a given region by conducting analyses of individual regions with two goals: (1) to determine if regional rare variation in aggregate is associated with risk; and (2) conditional upon the region being associated, to identify specific genetic variants within the region that are driving the association. In particular, we seek a formal integrated analysis that achieves both of our goals. For rare variants with low minor allele frequencies, there is very little power to statistically test the null hypothesis of equal allele or genotype counts for each variant. Thus, genetic association studies are often limited to detecting association within a subset of the common genetic markers. However, it is very likely that associations exist for the rare variants that may not be captured by the set of common markers. Our framework aims at constructing a risk index based on multiple rare variants within a region. Our analytical strategy is novel in that we use a Bayesian approach to incorporate model uncertainty in the selection of variants to include in the index as well as the direction of the associated effects. Additionally, the approach allows for inference at both the group and variant-specific levels. Using a set of simulations, we show that our methodology has added power over other popular rare variant methods to detect global associations. In addition, we apply the approach to sequence data from the WECARE Study of second primary breast cancers. Genet. Epidemiol. 35:638-649, 2011. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据