4.3 Article

Bayesian Variable and Model Selection Methods for Genetic Association Studies

期刊

GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 27-37

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20353

关键词

Bayesian model averaging; Bayesian variable selection; candidate gene; Markov chain Monte Carlo; reversible jump MCMC; stochastic search variable selection

资金

  1. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [R01EY014467] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Variable selection is growing in importance with the advent of high throughput genotyping methods requiring analysis of hundreds to thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the increased interest in using these genetic studies to better understand common, complex diseases. Up to now, the standard approach has been to analyze the genotypes for each SNP individually to look for an association with a disease. Alternatively, combinations of SNPs or haplotypes are analyzed for association. Another added complication in studying complex diseases or phenotypes is that genetic risk for the disease is often due to multiple SNPs in various locations on the chromosome with small individual effects that may have a collectively large effect on the phenotype. Hence, multi-locus SNP models, as opposed to single SNP models, may better capture the true underlying genotypic-phenotypic relationship. Thus, innovative methods for determining which SNPs to include in the model are needed. The goal of this article is to describe several methods currently available for variable and model selection using Bayesian approaches and to illustrate their application for genetic association studies using both real and simulated candidate gene data for a complex disease. In particular, Bayesian model averaging (BMA), stochastic search variable selection (SSVS), and Bayesian variable selection (BVS) using a reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) for candidate gene association studies are illustrated using a Study of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and simulated data. Genet. Epidemiol. 33:27-37, 2009. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据