4.3 Article

Estimation of Genotype Relative Risks From Pedigree Data by Retrospective Likelihoods

期刊

GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 287-298

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20460

关键词

ascertainment; bias; composite likelihood; gene-dropping; linkage; prostate cancer; relative risk

资金

  1. US Public Health Service
  2. National Institutes of Health [GM065450, GM67768, CA72818, CA15083, CA89600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pedigrees collected for linkage studies are a valuable resource that could be used to estimate genetic relative risks (RRs) for genetic variants recently discovered in case-control genome wide association studies. To estimate RRs from highly ascertained pedigrees, a pedigree retrospective likelihood can be used, which adjusts for ascertainment by conditioning on the phenotypes of pedigree members. We explore a variety of approaches to compute the retrospective likelihood, and illustrate a Newton-Raphson method that is computationally efficient particularly for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) modeled as log-additive effect of alleles on the RR. We also illustrate, by simulations, that a naive composite likelihood method that can lead to biased RR estimates, mainly by not conditioning on the ascertainment process or as we propose the disease status of all pedigree members. Applications of the retrospective likelihood to pedigrees collected for a prostate cancer linkage study and recently reported risk-SNPs illustrate the utility of our methods, with results showing that the RRs estimated from the highly ascertained pedigrees are consistent with odds ratios estimated in case-control studies. We also evaluate the potential impact of residual correlations of disease risk among family members due to shared unmeasured risk factors (genetic or environmental) by allowing for a random baseline risk parameter. When modeling only the affected family members in our data, there was little evidence for heterogeneity in baseline risks across families. Genet. Epidemiol. 34 : 287-298, 2010. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据