4.3 Article

Increasing the power of identifying gene x gene interactions in genome-wide association studies

期刊

GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 255-263

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20300

关键词

epistasis; two-stage analyses

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [U01CA125489, R01CA074841, P01CA053996, R29CA074841] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL074745] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCI NIH HHS [P01 CA053996, U01 CA125489, U01 CA125489-03, R29 CA074841, CA 74841, CA 53996, R01 CA074841-09, CA 125489, R01 CA074841, P01 CA053996-30] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 74745, R01 HL074745-03, R01 HL074745] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper we investigate the power to identify gene x gene interactions in genome-wide association studies. In our analysis we focus on two-stage analyses: analyses in which we only test for interactions between single nucleotide polymorphisms that show some marginal effect. We give two algorithms to compute significance levels for such an analyses. One involves a Bonferoni correction on the number of interactions that are actually tested, and one is a resampling procedure similar to the one proposed by [Lin (2006) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 78:505-509]. We also give an algorithm to carry out approximate power calculations for studies that plan to use a two-stage analysis. We find that for most plausible interaction effects a two-stage analysis can dramatically increase the power to identify interactions compared to a single-stage analysis based on simulation studies using known genetic models and data from existing genome-wide association studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据