4.2 Article

Microglia extensively survey the developing cortex via the CXCL12/CXCR4 system to help neural progenitors to acquire differentiated properties

期刊

GENES TO CELLS
卷 23, 期 10, 页码 915-922

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gtc.12632

关键词

CXCL12; CXCR4; developing cortex; intermediate progenitor; microglia; mid-embryonic stage; neural progenitor; Pax6; Tbr2

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [16J06207, 18K15003]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [22111006]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18K15003, 16J06207, 22111006] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neocortical development proceeds through the formation of new zones in which neural-lineage cells are organized based on their differentiation status. Although microglia initially distribute homogeneously throughout the growing cerebral wall, they accumulate in the inner cytogenic zone, the ventricular zone (VZ) and the subventricular zone (SVZ) in the mid-embryonic stage. However, the roles of these cells remain to be elucidated. In this study, we found that microglia, despite being only a minor population of the cells that constitute the cerebral wall, promote the differentiation of neural progenitor cells by frequently moving throughout the cortex; their migration is mediated by the CXCL12/CXCR4 system. Pulse-chase experiments confirmed that microglia help Pax6(+) stem-like cells to differentiate into Tbr2(+) intermediate progenitors. Further, monitoring of microglia by live imaging showed that administration of AMD3100, an antagonist of CXCR4, dampened microglial movement and decreased microglial surveillance throughout the cortex. In particular, arrest of microglial motion led to a prominent decrease in the abundance of Tbr2(+) cells in the SVZ. Based on our findings, we propose that extensive surveillance by microglia contributes to the efficient functioning of these cells, thereby regulating the differentiation of neural stem-like cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据