4.4 Article

Telomere-Mediated Genomic Instability and the Clinico-Pathological Parameters in Breast Cancer

期刊

GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER
卷 47, 期 12, 页码 1098-1109

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20608

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Medical Research Council (NMRC) [NMRC/0910/2004]
  2. Ministry of Health, Singapore [185-000-088-213]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study was undertaken to correlate telomere dysfunction and genomic instability with the histopathological grades and the estrogen and progesterone receptor status in breast cancer. Sixty-one archived breast tissues (38 cancer tissues and 23 paired normal tissues) were used in the study. The breast tumor tissues showed significantly shorter telomeres (7.7 kb) compared with the paired adjacent tissues (9.0 kb) by Southern blot analysis. Moreover, telomere shortening was more significant in Grade III tumors than in the Grade II tumors (P = 0.05). Quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization on paraffin tissue sections revealed a similar trend in telomere shortening. Telomere attrition was associated with telomere dysfunction as revealed by the presence of significantly higher anaphase bridges in tumor cells which was tumor grade dependent. Furthermore, estrogen receptive negative tumors displayed higher anaphase and internuclear bridges. Selected samples from each grade showed greater genomic imbalances in the higher grades than the lower grade tumors as detected by array-comparative genomic hybridization. Telomerase activity was found to be higher in the higher grades (Grade II and III) compared with the lower grade (Grade I). The average mRNA expression of TRFI and POTI was lower in the tumor tissues than in the normal tissues. Tankyrase I mRNA expression showed a grade-dependent increase in tumor tissues and its expression was also high in estrogen and progesterone negative tumors. The data support the notion that telomere dysfunction might be of value as a marker of aggressiveness of the tumors in breast cancer patients. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据