4.5 Article

Genetic burden in multiple sclerosis families

期刊

GENES AND IMMUNITY
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 434-440

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/gene.2013.37

关键词

multiple sclerosis; family study; genetic risk

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [RO1NS26799, RO1NS19142]
  2. National Multiple Sclerosis Society [RG2901]
  3. Cambridge NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
  4. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM)
  5. Fondation d'Aide pour la Recherche sur la Sclerose En Plaques (ARSEP)
  6. Association Francaise contre les Myopathies (AFM)
  7. GISIBISA
  8. program 'Investissements d'avenir' [ANR-10-IAIHU-06]
  9. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10335] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A previous study using cumulative genetic risk estimations in multiple sclerosis (MS) successfully tracked the aggregation of susceptibility variants in multi-case and single-case families. It used a limited description of susceptibility loci available at the time (17 loci). Even though the full roster of MS risk genes remains unavailable, we estimated the genetic burden in MS families and assess its disease predictive power using up to 64 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers according to the most recent literature. A total of 708 controls, 3251 MS patients and their relatives, as well as 117 twin pairs were genotyped. We validated the increased aggregation of genetic burden in multi-case compared with single-case families (P = 4.14e - 03) and confirm that these data offer little opportunity to accurately predict MS, even within sibships (area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) = 0.59 (0.55, 0.53)). Our results also suggest that the primary progressive and relapsing-type forms of MS share a common genetic architecture (P = 0.368; difference being limited to that corresponding to +/- 2 typical MS-associated SNPs). We have confirmed the properties of individual genetic risk score in MS. Comparing with previous reference point for MS genetics (17 SNPs), we underlined the corrective consequences of the integration of the new findings from GWAS and meta-analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据