4.5 Article

Rare mutations in TNFRSF13B increase the risk of asthma symptoms in Swedish children

期刊

GENES AND IMMUNITY
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 59-65

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/gene.2011.55

关键词

TACI; IgA; asthma; children; allergy; genetics

资金

  1. Health Care Sciences Postgraduate School
  2. Swedish Research Council
  3. EU [HEALTH-F2-2008-201549 EURO-PADnet]
  4. Stockholm County Council
  5. Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation
  6. Centre for Allergy Research, Karolinska Institutet

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TACI (transmembrane activator and calcium modulator and cyclophilin ligand interactor) mutations seem to be associated with autoimmunity and common variable immunodeficiency in humans. Because of its role in immune responses, we investigated the association between TACI mutations and infection proneness/asthma symptoms in children. A total of 2372 children were genotyped for TACI mutations (187N, C104R, S144X, A181E, R202H and ins204A). Serum IgA, IgG and specific IgE levels were determined in children with mutations. Data on parentally reported allergic diseases and infections were collected. In all, 55 individuals with TACI mutations were identified. Children with TACI mutations had a 2-fold increased risk of wheeze at 2 and 4 years of age and a 2.5-fold increased risk of asthma was seen at 4 years of age. None of the children with mutations suffered from IgA deficiency (< 0.07 gl (1)). No significant differences in serum IgG levels or specific IgE were found. Common variants in asthma susceptibility genes may account for up to 40% of cases of childhood-onset asthma, indicating a high contribution, compared with other common disorders. The role of rare variants/mutations in the pathogenesis of asthma is less clear. We conclude that mutations in TACI are the contributing factors for asthma symptoms in Swedish children, although the mechanisms still remain elusive. Genes and Immunity (2012) 13, 59-65; doi:10.1038/gene.2011.55; published online 18 August 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据