4.5 Article

Molecular subtypes of systemic sclerosis in association with anti-centromere antibodies and digital ulcers

期刊

GENES AND IMMUNITY
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 210-218

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/gene.2008.98

关键词

systemic sclerosis; genomics; autoantibodies; interferon; microarray; digital ulcers

资金

  1. AUTOROME
  2. Centre for Medical Systems Biology
  3. Netherlands Genomics Initiative/Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to identify molecular profiles that may distinguish clinical subtypes in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Large-scale gene expression profiling was performed on peripheral blood (PB) from 12 SSc patients and 6 healthy individuals. Significance analysis of microarrays, two-way hierarchical cluster analysis and PANTHER (Protein ANalysis THrough Evolutionary Relationships) ontology classification were used to analyze the data. Quantitative PCR was applied for validation in a cohort of 43 SSc patients. The results show that the expression of genes involved in immune defense, cell cycle and signal transduction was significantly elevated in PB of SSc patients (n = 12) compared with healthy individuals (n = 6). SSc patients could be stratified into subgroups based on differential expression of genes induced by type I interferon (IFN) and genes involved in antimicrobial (AM) activity. Differential expression of type I IFN or AM signature genes was validated and extended in an independent cohort of 31 patients by quantitative PCR. Low expression of IFN response genes was associated with the presence of anti-centromere antibodies, whereas increased expression was associated with the appearance of digital ulcers. In conclusion, patients with SSc can be classified on the basis of differential expression of immune defense genes. Differences in the activity of the type I IFN response program stratify patients into two clinically relevant subgroups. Genes and Immunity (2009) 10, 210-218; doi:10.1038/gene.2008.98; published online 8 January 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据