4.7 Article

Physiological modulation of endogenous BRCA1 p220 abundance suppresses DNA damage during the cell cycle

期刊

GENES & DEVELOPMENT
卷 27, 期 20, 页码 2274-2291

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gad.225045.113

关键词

BRCA1; miR-545; DNA damage; cell cycle; G0/G1

资金

  1. Breast Cancer SPORE grant
  2. National Cancer Institute [5 P01CA80111]
  3. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  4. Susan G. Komen Foundation for the Cure [SAC110022]
  5. National Institutes of Health Training grant [5T32CA00938-30]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endogenous BRCA1 p220 expression peaks in S and G2 when it is activated, and the protein participates in certain key DNA damage responses. In contrast, its expression is markedly reduced in G0/G1. While variations in transcription represent a significant part of p220 expression control, there is at least one other relevant process. We found that a microRNA, miR-545, that is expressed throughout the cell cycle down-modulates endogenous p220 mRNA and protein abundance directly in both G0/G1 and S/G2. When miR-545 function was inhibited by a specific antagomir, endogenous p220 expression increased in G0/G1, and aberrant p220-associated DNA damage responses and de novo DNA strand breaks accumulated. Analogous results were observed upon inhibition of miR-545 function in S/G2. Both sets of antagomir effects were mimicked by infecting cells with a p220 cDNA-encoding adenoviral vector. Thus, strand breaks were a product of p220 overexpression, and their prevention by miR-545 depends on its modulation of p220 expression. Breaks were also dependent on aberrant, overexpressed p220-driven recruitment of RAD51 to either spontaneously arising or mutagen-based DNA damage sites. Hence, when its level is not physiologically maintained, endogenous p220 aberrantly directs at least one DNA repair protein, RAD51, to damage sites, where their action contributes to the development of de novo DNA damage. Thus, like its loss, a surfeit of endogenous p220 function represents a threat to genome integrity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据