4.7 Article

Drosophila Neto is essential for clustering glutamate receptors at the neuromuscular junction

期刊

GENES & DEVELOPMENT
卷 26, 期 9, 页码 974-987

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gad.185165.111

关键词

glutamatergic synapses; postsynaptic density; glutamate receptor; synapse assembly; auxiliary subunits; Drosophila; neuromuscular junction

资金

  1. NIH
  2. NIH/NINDS [R01NS06878]
  3. NSF [IOS-0822236, IOS-1025556]
  4. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1025556] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [0822236] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neurotransmitter receptor recruitment at postsynaptic specializations is key in synaptogenesis, since this step confers functionality to the nascent synapse. The Drosophila neuromuscular junction (NMJ) is a glutamatergic synapse, similar in composition and function to mammalian central synapses. Various mechanisms regulating the extent of postsynaptic ionotropic glutamate receptor (iGluR) clustering have been described, but none are known to be essential for the initial localization and clustering of iGluRs at postsynaptic densities (PSDs). We identified and characterized the Drosophila neto (neuropilin and tolloid-like) as an essential gene required for clustering of iGluRs at the NMJ. Neto colocalizes with the iGluRs at the PSDs in puncta juxtaposing the active zones. neto loss-of-function phenotypes parallel the loss-of-function defects described for iGluRs. The defects in neto mutants are effectively rescued by muscle-specific expression of neto transgenes. Neto clustering at the Drosophila NMJ coincides with and is dependent on iGluRs. Our studies reveal that Drosophila Neto is a novel, essential component of the iGluR complexes and is required for iGluR clustering, organization of PSDs, and synapse functionality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据