4.7 Article

Reduced fidelity of branch point recognition and alternative splicing induced by the anti-tumor drug spliceostatin A

期刊

GENES & DEVELOPMENT
卷 25, 期 5, 页码 445-459

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gad.2014311

关键词

spliceostatin A; U2 snRNP; branch point; splicing fidelity; alternative splicing

资金

  1. Fundacion Marcelino Botin
  2. Fundacion Alicia Koplowicz
  3. AICR
  4. EURASNET
  5. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion
  6. Consolider-Ingenio RNAREG
  7. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion
  8. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spliceostatin A (SSA) is a stabilized derivative of a Pseudomonas bacterial fermentation product that displays potent anti-proliferative and anti-tumor activities in cancer cells and animal models. The drug inhibits pre-mRNA splicing in vitro and in vivo and binds SF3b, a protein subcomplex of U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP), which is essential for recognition of the pre-mRNA branch point. We report that SSA prevents interaction of an SF3b 155-kDa subunit with the pre-mRNA, concomitant with nonproductive recruitment of U2 snRNP to sequences 59 of the branch point. Differences in base-pairing potential with U2 snRNA in this region lead to different sensitivity of 39 splice sites to SSA, and to SSA-induced changes in alternative splicing. Indeed, rather than general splicing inhibition, splicing-sensitive microarray analyses reveal specific alternative splicing changes induced by the drug that significantly overlap with those induced by knockdown of SF3b 155. These changes lead to down-regulation of genes important for cell division, including cyclin A2 and Aurora A kinase, thus providing an explanation for the anti-proliferative effects of SSA. Our results reveal a mechanism that prevents nonproductive base-pairing interactions in the spliceosome, and highlight the regulatory and cancer therapeutic potential of perturbing the fidelity of splice site recognition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据