4.7 Article

Bcl-6 and NF-κB cistromes mediate opposing regulation of the innate immune response

期刊

GENES & DEVELOPMENT
卷 24, 期 24, 页码 2760-2765

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gad.1998010

关键词

Bcl-6; NF-kB; macrophage; inflammation; cistrome; ChIP-seq

资金

  1. NIH [1K08HL092298, P01HL088093, U19DK062434, R37DK057978, R01HD027183, R01HL086566, P30DK063491/DERC]
  2. Dr. Alan Fogelman and the David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California at Los Angeles
  3. Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation
  4. Chapman Foundation
  5. Howard Hughes Medical Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the macrophage, toll-like receptors (TLRs) are key sensors that trigger signaling cascades to activate inflammatory programs via the NF-kappa B gene network. However, the genomic network targeted by TLR/NF-kappa B activation and the molecular basis by which it is restrained to terminate activation and re-establish quiescence is poorly understood. Here, using chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq), we define the NF-kappa B cistrome, which is comprised of 31,070 cis-acting binding sites responsive to lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced signaling. In addition, we demonstrate that the transcriptional repressor B-cell lymphoma 6 (Bcl-6) regulates nearly a third of the Tlr4-regulated transcriptome, and that 90% of the Bcl-6 cistrome is collapsed following Tlr4 activation. Bcl6-deficient macrophages are acutely hypersensitive to LPS and, using comparative ChIP-seq analyses, we found that the Bcl-6 and NF-kappa B cistromes intersect, within nucleosomal distance, at nearly half of Bcl-6-binding sites in stimulated macrophages to promote opposing epigenetic modifications of the local chromatin. These results reveal a genomic strategy for controlling the innate immune response in which repressive and inductive cistromes establish a dynamic balance between macrophage quiescence and activation via epigenetically marked cis-regulatory elements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据