4.7 Article

Proper regulation of a sperm-specific cis-nat-siRNA is essential for double fertilization in Arabidopsis

期刊

GENES & DEVELOPMENT
卷 24, 期 10, 页码 1010-1021

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gad.1882810

关键词

ARIADNE; single fertilization; embryo; endosperm; small RNA; ubiquitin ligase

资金

  1. NSF [0211742]
  2. U.S. Department of Agriculture Current Research Information System [5335-21000-030-00]
  3. BARD [FI-391-2006]
  4. United States-Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund
  5. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [0211742] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural cis-antisense siRNAs (cis-nat-siRNAs) are a recently characterized class of small regulatory RNAs that are widespread in eukaryotes. Despite their abundance, the importance of their regulatory activity is largely unknown. The only functional role for eukaryotic cis-nat-siRNAs that has been described to date is in environmental stress responses in plants. Here we demonstrate that cis-nat-siRNA-based regulation plays key roles in Arabidopsis reproductive function, as it facilitates gametophyte formation and double fertilization, a developmental process of enormous agricultural value. We show that male gametophytic kokopelli (kpI) mutants display frequent single-fertilization events, and that KPL and a inversely transcribed gene, ARIADNE14 (ARI14), which encodes a putative ubiquitin E3 ligase, generate a sperm-specific nat-siRNA pair. In the absence of KPL, ARI14 RNA levels in sperm are increased and fertilization is impaired. Furthermore, ARI14 transcripts accumulate in several siRNA biogenesis pathway mutants, and overexpression of ARI14 in sperm phenocopies the reduced seed set of the kokopelli mutants. These results extend the regulatory capacity of cis-nat-siRNAs to development by identifying a role for cis-nat-siRNAs in controlling sperm function during double fertilization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据