4.5 Article

Threat-induced autonomic dysregulation in panic disorder evidenced by heart rate variability measures

期刊

GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 35, 期 5, 页码 497-501

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.06.001

关键词

Heart rate variability; Panic disorder; Autonomic nervous system; Threatening stimuli; Spectral Analyses

资金

  1. Korean Research Foundation [2006-2005152]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2006-2005152] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The objective was to compare autonomic response to threatening stimuli between patients with panic disorder (PD) and healthy volunteers by using 5-min recordings of heart rate variability (HRV). Methods: Twenty-seven patients with PD and 20 healthy controls were recruited. The first 5-min measurement of HRV was conducted at resting state. HRV measurement during threatening stimuli was conducted while participants were viewing 15 threatening pictures. Spectral analyses measures included high-frequency (HF; 0.15-0.4 HZ) component, low-frequency (LF; 0.04-0.15 Hz) component and LF/HF ratio. Results: There was no significant HRV difference between the two groups at the resting state. During threatening stimuli, the PD group had significantly higher LF power and LF/HF ratio and significantly lower HF power than the healthy controls (for all, P<.01). A two-way analysis of variance was employed to determine the effect of group (patient and control) and condition (threatening and resting) on all three HRV measures. The analysis showed a significant main effect of group (F=12.21; P<.01), condition (F=14.21; P<.001) and interaction effect between group and condition (F=4.83; P<.05) on LF/HF ratio. Conclusions: The findings from the present study suggest that patients with PD exhibit a sympathetic predominance when faced with threatening stimuli compared with normal control subjects. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据