4.5 Article

Prognostic association of depression following myocardial infarction with mortality and cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis of 25 years of research

期刊

GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 33, 期 3, 页码 203-216

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2011.02.007

关键词

Depression; Myocardial infarction; Prognosis; Mortality; Meta-analysis

资金

  1. Dutch Medical Research Council [016.086.397]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  3. Fonds de la Recherche en Sante Quebec

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: A meta-analysis of over 25 years of research into the relationship between post-myocardial infarction (MI) depression and cardiac prognosis was conducted to investigate changes in this association over time and to investigate subgroup effects. Method: A systematic literature search was performed (Medline, Embase and PsycINFO; 1975-2011) without language restrictions. Studies investigating the impact of post-MI depression on cardiovascular outcome, defined as all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality and cardiac events within 24 months after the index MI, were identified. Depression had to be assessed within 3 months after MI using established instruments. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using a random effects model. Results: A total of 29 studies were identified, resulting in 41 comparisons. Follow-up (on average 16 months) was described for 16,889 MI patients. Post-MI depression was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality [(OR), 2.25; 95% confidence interval [Cl], 1.73-2.93; P<.001], cardiac mortality (OR, 2.71; 95% Cl, 1.68-4.36; P<.001) and cardiac events (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.37-1.85; P<.001). ORs proved robust in subgroup analyses but declined over the years for cardiac events. Conclusions: Post-MI depression is associated with a 1.6- to 2.7-fold increased risk of impaired outcomes within 24 months. This association has been relatively stable over the past 25 years. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据