4.2 Article

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor stimulates growth of pituitary melanotrope cells in an autocrine way

期刊

GENERAL AND COMPARATIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 170, 期 1, 页码 156-161

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2010.09.020

关键词

BDNF; ERK; Autostimulation; Melanotrope cell; Cell growth; Xenopus laevis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is expressed in the mammalian pituitary gland, in both the anterior and intermediate lobes, where its functional significance is unknown. Melanotrope cells in the intermediate pituitary lobe of the amphibian Xenopus laevis also produce BDNF, which co-exists in secretory granules with alpha-melanophore-stimulating hormone (alpha-MSH), a peptide that causes pigment dispersion in dermal melanophores during adaptation of the toad to a dark background. Xenopus melanotropes are highly plastic, undergoing very strong growth to support the high biosynthesis and release of alpha-MSH in black-adapted animals. In this study we have tested our hypothesis that this enhanced growth of the melanotrope is maintained by autocrine release of BDNF. Furthermore, since the extracellular-regulated kinase (ERR) pathway is a major component of BDNF signaling in neuronal plasticity, we investigated its involvement in melanotrope cell growth. For these purposes melanotropes were treated for 3 days in vitro, with either an anti-BDNF serum or a recombinant tropomyosin-receptor kinase B (TrkB) receptor fragment to eliminate released BDNF, or with the ERR inhibitor U0126. We also applied a novel inhibitor of the TrkB receptor, cyclotraxin-B, to test this receptor's involvement in melanotrope cell growth regulation. All treatments markedly reduced melanotrope cell growth. Therefore, we conclude that autocrine release of BDNF and subsequent TrkB-dependent ERR-mediated signaling is important for melanotrope cell growth during its physiologically induced activation. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据