4.2 Article

LH secretion and ovulation following exposure of Arctic charr to different temperature and photoperiod regimes: Responsiveness of females to a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue and a dopamine antagonist

期刊

GENERAL AND COMPARATIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 162, 期 2, 页码 210-218

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.03.005

关键词

Arctic charr; Temperature; Photoperiod; LH; Ovulation; GnRH; Dopamine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The timing of ovulation and LH plasma levels were investigated in Arctic chart reared at 5 degrees C and 10 degrees C, exposed to the ambient photoperiod, or short or long-day photoperiod regimes during the prespawning period. The effectiveness of sGnRHa alone, or sGnRHa combined with a dopamine antagonist, in stimulating LH secretion and inducing ovulation was also investigated. With the natural photoperiod, ovulation occurred spontaneously at 5 degrees C, but was inhibited at 10 degrees C. A transition from 10 to 5 degrees C soon resulted in suppression of the inhibition. At 5 degrees C, the effectiveness of sGnRHa was similar to that of sGnRHa combined with pimozide in stimulating LH secretion and inducing ovulation. At 10 degrees C, sGnRHa + pimozide was more effective that sGnRHa alone in stimulating LH secretion and inducing a high rate of ovulation, suggesting that dopamine-induced inhibition of LH secretion could occur naturally in Arctic chart at 10 degrees C. Exposure of Arctic chart to a long day (LD) photoperiod regime in fall and winter did not completely inhibit ovulation, but markedly delayed it and prolonged the ensuing ovulation period. The LD photoperiod also reduced LH plasma levels in females while they were ovulating, but did not modify the responsiveness of the pituitary to GnRHa stimulation compared to a control group exposed to a short-day (SD) photoperiod. There was an interval of several weeks after a transition from LD to SD before LH secretion and ovulation were stimulated. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据