4.1 Review

Arthropod venom Hyaluronidases: biochemical properties and potential applications in medicine and biotechnology

出版社

CEVAP-SAO PAULO STATE UNIV-UNESP
DOI: 10.1186/s40409-015-0042-7

关键词

Hyaluronidase; Scorpion; Spider; Caterpillar; Hymenoptera; Insects; Cloning; Heterologous expression; PEGylation; Biotechnological applications

资金

  1. State of Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2011/23236-4, 2014/06170-8, 2011/12317-3]
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [303689/2013-7]
  3. Support Nucleus for Research on Animal Toxins (NAP-TOXAN-USP) [12-125432.1.3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyaluronidases are enzymes that mainly degrade hyaluronan, the major glycosaminoglycan of the interstitial matrix. They are involved in several pathological and physiological activities including fertilization, wound healing, embryogenesis, angiogenesis, diffusion of toxins and drugs, metastasis, pneumonia, sepsis, bacteremia, meningitis, inflammation and allergy, among others. Hyaluronidases are widely distributed in nature and the enzymes from mammalian spermatozoa, lysosomes and animal venoms belong to the subclass EC 3.2.1.35. To date, only five three-dimensional structures for arthropod venom hyaluronidases (Apis mellifera and Vespula vulgaris) were determined. Additionally, there are four molecular models for hyaluronidases from Mesobuthus martensii, Polybia paulista and Tityus serrulatus venoms. These enzymes are employed as adjuvants to increase the absorption and dispersion of other drugs and have been used in various off-label clinical conditions to reduce tissue edema. Moreover, a PEGylated form of a recombinant human hyaluronidase is currently under clinical trials for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. This review focuses on the arthropod venom hyaluronidases and provides an overview of their biochemical properties, role in the envenoming, structure/activity relationship, and potential medical and biotechnological applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据