4.5 Article

In vitro and in vivo comparison of viral and cellular internal ribosome entry sites for bicistronic vector expression

期刊

GENE THERAPY
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 631-636

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/gt.2011.11

关键词

bicistronic; co-expression; EMCV; IRES; VCIP

资金

  1. NSERC
  2. Cancer Research Training Program
  3. Beatrice Hunter Cancer Research Institute
  4. Terry Fox Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bicistronic vectors are essential to achieve efficient expression of multiple genes in gene therapy protocols and biomedical applications. Internal ribosome entry site (IRES) elements have been utilized to initiate expression of an additional protein from a bicistronic vector. The IRES element commonly used in current bicistronic vectors originates from the encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV). As IRES-mediated translation is dependent on availability of IRES trans-acting factors, which vary between cell types and species, adequate gene expression from the EMCV IRES element is not always achieved. To identify a novel IRES element that mediates gene expression consistently with a higher efficiency than the EMCV IRES, we tested 13 bicistronic reporter constructs containing different viral and cellular IRES elements. The in vitro screening in human and mouse fibroblast and hepatocarcinoma cells revealed that the vascular endothelial growth factor and type 1 collagen-inducible protein (VCIP) IRES was the only IRES element that directed translation more efficiently than the EMCV IRES in all cell lines. Furthermore, the VCIP IRES initiated greater reporter expression levels than the EMCV IRES in transfected mouse livers. These results suggest that VCIP-IRES containing vectors improve gene expression compared with those harboring an EMCV-IRES. This could increase the potential benefits of bicistronic vectors for experimental and therapeutic purposes. Gene Therapy (2011) 18, 631-636; doi: 10.1038/gt.2011.11; published online 10 March 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据