4.5 Article

Differential immune responses mediated by adenovirus- and lentivirus-transduced DCs in a HER-2/neu overexpressing tumor model

期刊

GENE THERAPY
卷 18, 期 10, 页码 986-995

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/gt.2011.53

关键词

HER-2/neu; adenovirus; lentivirus; dendritic cells vaccine

资金

  1. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
  2. Terry Fox Foundation Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent investigations have demonstrated that adenoviral and lentiviral vectors encoding HER-2 can be utilized in cancer immunotherapy. However, it is not known whether both viral systems elicit a similar immune response. Here, we compare the immune response in mice induced by dendritic cells (DCs) infected with either recombinant adenovirus or lentivirus encoding rat HER-2 (rHER-2). Both vaccine types yielded similar control of tumor growth, but we found clear differences in their immune responses 10 days after DC immunization. Adenovirus rHER-2-transduced DCs elicited locally and systemically high frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, while lentivirus rHER-2-transduced DCs predominantly led to CD4+ T-cell infiltration at the tumor site. Splenocytes from mice immunized with lentivirus rHER-2-transduced DCs secreted higher levels of interferon (IFN)-gamma, mainly by CD4+ T cells, following stimulation by RM-1-mHER-2 tumors. In contrast, the adenovirus vaccinated group exhibited CD4+ and CD8+ T cells that both contributed to IFN-gamma production. Besides an established cellular immune response, the rHER-2/DC vaccine elicited a significant humoral response that was highest in the adenovirus group. DC subsets and regulatory T cells in the spleen were also differentially modulated in the two vaccine systems. Finally, adoptive transfer of splenocytes from both groups of immunized mice strongly inhibited in vivo tumor growth. Our results suggest that not only the target antigen but also the virus system may determine the nature and magnitude of antitumor immunity by DC vaccination. Gene Therapy (2011) 18, 986-995; doi:10.1038/gt.2011.53; published online 14 April 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据