4.5 Article

High AAV vector purity results in serotype- and tissue-independent enhancement of transduction efficiency

期刊

GENE THERAPY
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 503-510

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/gt.2009.157

关键词

AAV; vector purity; transduction efficiency

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [SAF2005-01262, SAF2008-00962]
  2. CIBER de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabolicas Asociadas, Spain, European Community [LSHB-CT-2006-018933]
  3. National Institute of Health [2PO1 HL64190]
  4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purity of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector preparations has important implications for both safety and efficacy of clinical gene transfer. Early-stage screening of candidates for AAV-based therapeutics ideally requires a purification method that is flexible and also provides vectors comparable in purity and potency to the prospective investigational product manufactured for clinical studies. The use of cesium chloride (CsCl) gradient-based protocols provides the flexibility for purification of different serotypes; however, a commonly used first-generation CsCl-based protocol was found to result in AAV vectors containing large amounts of protein and DNA impurities and low transduction efficiency in vitro and in vivo. Here, we describe and characterize an optimized, second-generation CsCl protocol that incorporates differential precipitation of AAV particles by polyethylene glycol, resulting in higher yield and markedly higher vector purity that correlated with better transduction efficiency observed with several AAV serotypes in multiple tissues and species. Vectors purified by the optimized CsCl protocol were found to be comparable in purity and functional activity to those prepared by more scalable, but less flexible serotype-specific purification processes developed for manufacture of clinical vectors, and are therefore ideally suited for pre-clinical studies supporting translational research. Gene Therapy (2010) 17, 503-510; doi: 10.1038/gt.2009.157; published online 3 December 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据