4.5 Article

Induction of protective cytotoxic T-cell responses by a B-cell-based cellular vaccine requires stable expression of antigen

期刊

GENE THERAPY
卷 16, 期 11, 页码 1300-1313

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/gt.2009.93

关键词

cancer immunotherapy; cellular vaccine; B cell; gene delivery

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI063967]
  2. Department of Pathology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

B-cell-based cellular vaccines represent a promising approach to active immunotherapy of cancer complementing the use of dendritic cells, especially in pediatric patients and patients with low bone marrow reserves. B cells can be easily prepared in large numbers and readily home to secondary lymphoid organs, the primary site of induction of cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses. However, most B-cell-based vaccines tested so far failed to induce functional and protective CTLs in in vivo models. Here, we show that B-cells activated through the toll-like receptor-9 (TLR-9) and CD40 up-regulate surface expression of major histocompatibility complex and costimulatory molecules, produce IL-12, and exhibit potent antigen-presenting properties in vitro. Importantly, although administration of peptide-coated or transiently transfected B cells fails to induce immune responses, therapeutic immunization with low numbers of genetically modified B cells stably expressing antigen results in an induction of functional CTLs and protection against the growth of tumor in an animal model. After activation, B cells partially loose their ability to home to organized lymphoid tissue because of the shedding of CD62L; however, this property can be restored by expression of protease-resistant mutant of CD62L. In summary, the data presented in this report suggest that genetically modified activated B cells represent a promising candidate for a cancer vaccine eliciting functional systemic CTLs. Gene Therapy (2009) 16, 1300-1313; doi:10.1038/gt.2009.93; published online 30 July 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据