4.5 Article

Development of optimal bicistronic lentiviral vectors facilitates high-level TCR gene expression and robust tumor cell recognition

期刊

GENE THERAPY
卷 15, 期 21, 页码 1411-1423

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/gt.2008.90

关键词

T-cell receptor; adoptive immunotherapy; tumor immunity; lentivirus; 2A peptide

资金

  1. Center for Cancer Research
  2. National Cancer Institute
  3. National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In human gene therapy applications, lentiviral vectors may have advantages over gamma-retroviral vectors in several areas, including the ability to transduce nondividing cells, resistance to gene silencing and a potentially safer integration site profile. However, unlike gamma-retroviral vectors it has been problematic to drive the expression of multiple genes efficiently and coordinately with approaches such as internal ribosome entry sites or dual promoters. Using different 2A peptides, lentiviral vectors expressing two-gene T-cell receptors directed against the melanoma differentiation antigens gp100 and MART-1 were constructed. We demonstrated that addition of amino-acid spacer sequences (GSG or SGSG) before the 2A sequence is a prerequisite for efficient synthesis of biologically active T-cell receptors and that addition of a furin cleavage site followed by a V5 peptide tag yielded optimal T-cell receptor gene expression. Furthermore, we determined that the furin cleavage site was recognized in lymphocytes and accounted for removal of residual 2A peptides at the post-translational level with an efficiency of 20-30%, which could not be increased by addition of multiple furin cleavage sites. The novel bicistronic lentiviral vector developed herein afforded robust anti-melanoma activities to engineered peripheral blood lymphocytes, including cytokine secretion, cell proliferation and lytic activity. Such optimal vectors may have immediate applications in cancer gene therapy. Gene Therapy (2008) 15, 1411-1423; doi:10.1038/gt.2008.90; published online 22 May 2008

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据