4.6 Article

Promoter polymorphisms of pri-miR-34b/c are associated with hepatocellular carcinoma

期刊

GENE
卷 524, 期 2, 页码 156-160

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.04.042

关键词

Hepatocellular carcinoma; miR-34b/c; TP53; Polymorphism

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Korean Government [2009-0075784, 2012R1A1A2007033]
  3. Priority Research Centers Program Grant
  4. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology, Republic of Korea [2009-0093821]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A1A2007033] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Numerous studies have focused on the association between miR-34 family members, which are direct p53 targets, and carcinogenesis of many cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to assess whether polymorphisms in the single-nucleotide polymorphism miR-34b/cT>C (rs4938723) and TP53 Arg72Pro (rs1042522) increase the risk of HCC and influence outcome in patients with HCC. Patients and methods: We enrolled 157 HCC patients and 201 cancer-free control subjects from the Korean population. MicroRNA polymorphisms were genotyped using the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. Results: We found that the miR-34b/cTC + CC frequency was significantly higher in HCC patients than in controls (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.580; 95% confidence interval [Cl]: 1.029-2.426). The miR-34b/c CC-TP53 Arg/Arg combination significantly increased the risk of HCC (AOR: 13.644; 95% Cl: 1.451-128.301). The SNPs miR-34b/c T>C and TP53 Arg72Pro(G>C) had no influence on survival of HCC patients. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that loss of the T allele in miR-34b/c T>C, and the miR-34b/c CC-TP53 Arg/Arg combination increases the risk of HCC in the Korean population. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据