4.6 Article

A fast SNP identification and analysis of intraspecific variation in the medicinal Panax species based on DNA barcoding

期刊

GENE
卷 530, 期 1, 页码 39-43

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.07.097

关键词

Panax; SNPs; ITS2; Intraspecific variation; Intragenomic divergence

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81001608]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2012C02]
  3. Basic Scientific Research Operation Grants for State-Level Public Welfare Scientific Research Initiatives [YZ-12-08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Medicinal plants of the Panax genus belonging to Araliaceae family are well-known, rare plants used as tonics in traditional Chinese medicine and have been described in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia. Because of the high price and the huge human demand, these commercial products often contain adulterants. In this study, 377 sequences from four species were analyzed. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were detected and patterns of intragenomic variation in internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) from the four Panax species were studied. Intraspecific variations were analyzed based on three typical DNA barcodings (ITS2, matK and psbA-trnH). Results from this study revealed that intraspecific genetic distances in Panax ginseng and Panax quinquefolius were quite low (0-0.002) and the multi-copy ITS2 could be considered a single locus in the genomes of these two species. Five stable SNPs were detected in ITS2 region to identify the Panax medicinal species. Considering the mixed powder of P. ginseng and P. quinquefolius, double peaks could be clearly examined at SNP positions and the height of the peaks could indicate the mixed ratio roughly. Our findings indicate that SNP-based molecular barcodes could be developed as a routine method for the identification of the Panax genus with closely related species and the mixed powder P. ginseng and P. quinquefolius. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据