4.6 Article

Molecular characterisation and regulation of a Nicotiana tabacum S-domain receptor-like kinase gene induced during an early rapid response to lipopolysaccharides

期刊

GENE
卷 501, 期 1, 页码 39-48

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.03.073

关键词

Lipopolysaccharide; MAMP; Plant defence; S-domain RLKs; Salicylic acid; Signal perception

资金

  1. South African National Research Foundation [206492]
  2. University of Johannesburg
  3. The Carl and Emily Fuchs Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The isolation, characterization and regulation of the first lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-responsive S-domain receptor-like kinase (RLK) in Nicotiana tabacum are reported. The gene, corresponding to a differentially expressed LPS-responsive EST, was fully characterised to investigate its involvement in LPS-induced responses. The full genomic sequence, designated Nt-Sd-RLK, encodes for a S-domain RLK protein containing conserved modules (B-lectin-, S- and PAN-domains) reported to function in mediating protein-protein and protein-carbohydrate interactions in its extracellular domain, as well as the molecular architecture to transduce signals intracellularly through a Ser/Thr kinase domain. Phylogenetic analysis clustered Nt-Sd-RLK with S-domain RLKs induced by bacteria, wounding and salicylic acid. Perception of LPS induced a rapid, bi-phasic response in Nt-Sd-RLK expression with a 17-fold up-regulation at 3 and 9 h. A defence-related W-box cis element was found in the promoter region of Nt-Sd-RLK and the transient induction of Nt-Sd-RLK in cultured cells by LPS exhibited a pattern typical of early response defence genes. Nt-Sd-RLK was also responsive to salicylic acid induction and was expressed in differentiated leaf tissue, where LPS elicited local as well as systemic up-regulation. The results contribute new knowledge about the potential role that S-domain RLKs may play within interactive signal transduction pathways associated with immunity and defence. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据