4.6 Article

The Arabidopsis AP2/ERF transcription factor RAP2.6 participates in ABA, salt and osmotic stress responses

期刊

GENE
卷 457, 期 1-2, 页码 1-12

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2010.02.011

关键词

ABA; Abiotic stress; Arabidopsis thaliana; RAP2.6

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2006CB100106, 2010CB126600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30571196, 0933ZF11C1, 0933Z411C1]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2007AA10Z187]
  4. Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [08DZ2270800]
  5. Key Laboratory of Soybean Biology in Chinese Education Ministry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AP2/ERF proteins play crucial roles in various biological processes. RAP2.6, an Arabidopsis AP2/ERF family member, has been reported to function in plant response to biotic stress, but whether it also functions in plant response to abiotic stress is not known. In this work, we demonstrate that in wild-type Arabidopsis, the expression of RAP2.6 is responsive to abscisic acid (ABA) and different stress conditions such as high salt, osmotic stress, and cold. Trans-activating ability tests in yeast demonstrate that RAP2.6 could act as a transactivator. RAP2.6 is able to bind to the GCC and CE1 cis-elements, as confirmed by both electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and yeast one-hybrid assay. Experiments with RAP2.6-YFP fusion protein indicated that RAP2.6 is nuclear localized. Overexpression of RAP2.6 conferred hypersensitivity to exogenous ABA and abiotic stresses during seed germination and early seedling growth in Arabidopsis. The ABA content in RAP2.6 overexpressor lines decreased after being treated with salt. Furthermore, transcripts of AtABl4 and some stress inducible genes increased, and loss of ABl4 function rescues the hypersensitive phenotype of RAP2.6 overexpression lines under ABA and stress treatment. These results suggest that RAP2.6 participates in abiotic stress, possibly through the ABA-dependent pathway. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据