4.6 Article

Embryonic nervous system genes predominate in searches for dinucleotide simple sequence repeats flanked by conserved sequences

期刊

GENE
卷 429, 期 1-2, 页码 74-79

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2008.09.025

关键词

Highly conserved elements; HCEs; Simple sequence repeats; SSRs; Dinucleotide simple sequence repeats; diSSRs; Microsatellites; Nervous system; Development

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK038955-15] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To study evolution of dinucleotide simple sequence repeats (diSSRs) we searched recently available mammalian genomes for UTR-localized diSSRs with conserved upstream flanking sequences (CFS). There were 252 reported Homo sapiens genes containing the repeats (AC)n, (GT)n, (AG)n or (CT)n in their UTRs including 22 (8.7%) with diSSR-upstream flanking sequences conserved comparing divergent mammalian lineages represented by Homo sapiens and the marsupial, Monodelphis domestica. Of these 22 genes, 19 had known functions including 18 (95%) that proved critical for mammalian nervous systems (Fishers exact test, P<0.0001). The remaining gene, Cd2ap, proved critical for development of kidney podocytes, cells that have multiple similarities to neurons. Gene functions included voltage and chloride channels, synapse-associated proteins, neurotransmitter receptors, axon and dendrite pathfinders, a NeuroD potentiator and other neuronal activities. Repeat length polymorphism was confirmed for 68% of CFS diSSRs even though these repeats were nestled among highly conserved sequences. This finding supports a hypothesis that SSR polymorphism has functional implications. A parallel study was performed on the self-complementary diSSRs (AT)n and (GC)n. When flanked by conserved sequences, the self-complementary diSSR (AT)n was also associated with genes expressed in the developing nervous system. Our findings implicate functional roles for diSSRs in nervous system development. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据