3.9 Article

Donor Recipient Sex Mismatch in Kidney Transplantation

期刊

GENDER MEDICINE
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 335-347

出版社

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.genm.2012.07.004

关键词

gender; H-Y; kidney transplant; minor histocompatibility; sex

资金

  1. Katherine McCormick Faculty Development Award at Stanford University
  2. NIDDK [K23 DK087937, K24 DK085446]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The lack of reliable human proxies for minor (ie, non-HLA) histocompatibility loci hampers the ability to leverage these factors toward improving transplant outcomes. Despite conflicting reports of the effect of donor recipient sex mismatch on renal allografts, the association between acute rejection of renal allografts and the development of human alloantibodies to the male H-Y antigen suggested to us that donor recipient sex mismatch deserved re-evaluation. Objective: To evaluate whether the relationships between donor sex and allograft failure differed by recipient sex. Methods: We studied recipients of deceased-donor (n = 125,369) and living-donor (n = 63,139) transplants in the United States Renal Data System. Using Cox proportional hazards models stratified by donor type, we estimated the association between donor recipient sex mismatch and death-censored allograft failure with adjustment for known risk factors, with and without the use of multiple imputation methods to account for potential bias and/or loss of efficiency due to missing data. Results: The advantage afforded by male donor kidneys was more pronounced among male than among female recipients (8% vs 2% relative risk reduction; interaction P < 0.01). This difference is of the order of magnitude of several other risk factors affecting donor selection decisions. Conclusions: Donor recipient sex mismatch affects renal allograft survival in a direction consistent with immune responses to sexually determined minor histocompatibility antigens. Our study provides a paradigm for clinical detection of markers for minor histocompatibility loci. (Gend Med. 2012;9:335-347) (c) 2012 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据