4.6 Article

Mapping the genome of Miscanthus sinensis for QTL associated with biomass productivity

期刊

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 797-810

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12201

关键词

biofuel; biomass; drought tolerance; genetic architecture; Miscanthus; QTL; synteny

资金

  1. Consortium for Plant Biotechnology Research [GO12026]
  2. Department of Energy [DE-FG36-02GO12026]
  3. Energy Bioscience Institute
  4. DuPont Pioneer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In light of rising energy costs, lignocellulosic ethanol has been identified as a renewable alternative to petroleum-based transportation fuels. In an attempt to reach government mandated ethanol production levels, potential plant biofeedstock candidates have been investigated, and cold-tolerant, perennial accessions within the C-4 grass genus Miscanthus have been identified as leading contenders in the Midwestern US. To facilitate the development of improved cultivars through marker-assisted breeding, a quantitative trait locus (QTL) study was conducted on a full-sib, F-1 mapping population segregating for flowering time, height, leaf width, and yield using a genetic map consisting of 846 segregating SNP and SSR markers. This was a 3year study investigating the genetic architecture underlying traits important to biomass production in a population of 221 progeny from a cross between M. sinensis Grosse Fountaine' and M. sinensis Undine' established in the spring of 2010; 72 QTLs with LOD scores above the genome-wide, permuted threshold equivalent to a P-value of 0.05 were identified across 13 traits. Of the 36 QTLs identified in 2011, 22 were detected again the following year. Both the use of spring emergence and vigor rating as a covariate to account for variation related to differences in establishment increased the power to detect QTLs in the 2year establishment period. Finally, a dry period in the middle of the 2012 growing season suggested that yield declines were due to a decrease in tiller diameter.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据