4.6 Editorial Material

Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops

期刊

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY
卷 1, 期 1, 页码 75-96

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2008.01001.x

关键词

bioenergy; cellulosic ethanol; conservation reserve program (CRP); corn residue; land conversion; Miscanthus; prairie; sugarcane; switchgrass

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One potentially significant impact of growing biofuel crops will be the sequestration or release of carbon (C) in soil. Soil organic carbon (SOC) represents an important C sink in the lifecycle C balances of biofuels and strongly influences soil quality. We assembled and analyzed published estimates of SOC change following conversion of natural or agricultural land to biofuel crops of corn with residue harvest, sugarcane, Miscanthus x giganteus, switchgrass, or restored prairie. We estimated SOC losses associated with land conversion and rates of change in SOC over time by regressing net change in SOC relative to a control against age since establishment year. Conversion of uncultivated land to biofuel agriculture resulted in significant SOC losses - an effect that was most pronounced when native land was converted to sugarcane agriculture. Corn residue harvest (at 25-100% removal) consistently resulted in SOC losses averaging 3-8 Mg ha(-1) in the top 30 cm, whereas SOC accumulated under all four perennial grasses, with SOC accumulation rates averaging <1 Mg ha(-1)yr(-1) in the top 30 cm. More intensive harvests led to decreased C gains or increased C losses - an effect that was particularly clear for residue harvest in corn. Direct or indirect conversion of previously uncultivated land for biofuel agriculture will result in SOC losses that counteract the benefits of fossil fuel displacement. Additionally, SOC losses under corn residue harvest imply that its potential to offset C emissions may be overestimated, whereas SOC sequestration under perennial grasses represents an additional benefit that has rarely been accounted for in life cycle analyses of biofuels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据