4.7 Article

Endoscopic dilation of dominant stenoses in primary sclerosing cholangitis: outcome after long-term treatment

期刊

GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
卷 71, 期 3, 页码 527-534

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.041

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Primary sclerosing cholangitis is characterized by progressive fibrotic inflammation and obliteration of intra- and/or extrahepatic bile ducts. Total or subtotal stenoses of major bile reduced survival. Objective: To evaluate the outcome after long-term endoscopic treatment. Design: Prospective, single-center study. Setting: Tertiary care academic medical center. Patients: A total of 171 patients treated with ursodeoxycholic acid were followed for as long as 20 years. At entry, 20 patients had dominant stenoses, and during a median follow-up period of 7.1 years, dominant stenosis developed in another 77. Interventions: Ninety-six patients with dominant stenoses were treated by repeated balloon dilation; 5 patients with complete obstruction with bacterial cholangitis were stented. Main Outcome Measurements: survival free of liver transplantation, number of procedures, complications, Results: In total, 500 balloon dilations were performed and 5 stents were placed. Complications were pancreatitis (2.2%), bacterial cholangitis (1.4%), and bile duct Perforation (0.2%); there were no deaths. Repeated endoscopic interventions allowed the preservation of a functioning common bile duct and of at least I hepatic duct LIP to 2 cm above the bifurcation in all patients. Progression of intrahepatic bile duct and liver disease led to the need for liver transplantation in 22 of 96 patients. Five years after the first dilation of a dominant stenosis, the survival free of liver transplantation rate was 81%, and after 10 years, it was 52%. Limitations: Single-center study, no control group, primary end-Stage liver disease excluded. Conclusion: Repeated endoscopic balloon dilations of dominant stenoses allow the preservation of a functioning common bile duct for Many years. (Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71:527-34.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据