4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Case series of endoscopic balloon dilation to treat a stricture caused by circumferential resection of the gastric antrum by endoscopic submucosal dissection

期刊

GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
卷 67, 期 6, 页码 979-983

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.12.023

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) plays an important role in the management of gastric neoplasms. There are few reports regarding stricture development caused by ESD of gastric neoplasms. Objective: The present study aimed to determine the incidence of gastric stricture formation after ESD of gastric neoplasms and to report on the outcome and management of this complication: endoscopic intervention (ie, balloon dilation) versus surgery; the outcome of balloon dilation (success or failure/perforation). Design: A case series from a retrospective review of gastric ESDs performed at Saga Medical School over a defined period of time. Setting: Double-center territory, referral hospital. Patients: An evaluation was performed in 532 patients with gastric mucosal tumors treated by ESD. A stricture was reported in 5 patients. All the 5 cases were located in the antrum. ESD that was performed in the cardia or the proximal stomach did not induce a stricture. Results: Of the 5 cases of symptomatic gastric outlet obstruction, 1 patient required surgical intervention because of a near total gastric outlet obstruction not amenable to endoscopic intervention. The 4 patients underwent step-serial through-the-scope balloon dilations; in 2 patients, the procedure was successful, but in the other 2 patients, the procedure was complicated by a gastric perforation (50% incidence of perforation). Limitation: A retrospective study. Conclusions: Circumferential or subcircumferential resection by ESD in the antrum-caused a stricture. Balloon dilation of the ESD gastric outlet obstruction might be a choice, but it is a risky treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据