4.5 Article

Thick sputtered tantalum coatings for high-temperature energy conversion applications

期刊

出版社

A V S AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1116/1.4935156

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [ECS-0335765]
  2. Solid-State Solar-Thermal Energy Conversion Center (S3TEC), an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences (BES) [DE-SC0001299/DE-FG02-09ER46577]
  3. U.S. Army Research Laboratory
  4. U.S. Army Research Office through the Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies [W911NF-13-D-0001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thick sputtered tantalum (Ta) coatings on polished Inconel were investigated as a potential replacement for bulk refractory metal substrates used for high-temperature emitters and absorbers in thermophotovoltaic energy conversion applications. In these applications, high-temperature stability and high reflectance of the surface in the infrared wavelength range are critical in order to sustain operational temperatures and reduce losses due to waste heat. The reflectance of the coatings (8 and 30 mu m) was characterized with a conformal protective hafnia layer as-deposited and after one hour anneals at 700, 900, and 1100 degrees C. To further understand the high-temperature performance of the coatings, the microstructural evolution was investigated as a function of annealing temperature. X-ray diffraction was used to analyze the texture and residual stress in the coatings at four reflections (220, 310, 222, and 321), as-deposited and after anneal. No significant changes in roughness, reflectance, or stress were observed. No delamination or cracking occurred, even after annealing the coatings at 1100 degrees C. Overall, the results of this study suggest that the thick Ta coatings are a promising alternative to bulk substrates and pave the way for a relatively low-cost and easily integrated platform for nanostructured devices in high-temperature energy conversion applications. (C) 2015 American Vacuum Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据