4.8 Article

Challenges to the Design, Execution, and Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 143, 期 6, 页码 1461-1469

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.09.031

关键词

Inflammatory Bowel Disease; Crohn's Disease; Ulcerative Colitis; Trial Design; Clinical Trials

资金

  1. Abbott Laboratories
  2. ActoGeniX
  3. Centocor
  4. Cosmo
  5. enGene
  6. Ferring Pharmaceuticals
  7. GlaxoSmithKline
  8. Janssen Biologics
  9. Millennium Pharmaceuticals
  10. MSD
  11. Novo Nordisk
  12. PDL BioPharma
  13. Pfizer
  14. SetPoint
  15. Shire
  16. Takeda
  17. Teva
  18. UCB
  19. Given Imaging
  20. Falk Pharma
  21. PhotoPill
  22. Tillotts Pharma AG
  23. Tramedico
  24. Norgine
  25. Vifor Pharma
  26. Synta Pharmaceuticals
  27. Merck
  28. Elan/Biogen
  29. Janssen-Ortho
  30. Protein Design Labs
  31. Isis Pharmaceuticals
  32. Teva Pharmaceuticals
  33. Santarus
  34. Schering-Plough
  35. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  36. Celgene
  37. CombinatoRx
  38. UCB Pharma
  39. Napo Pharma
  40. Procter Gamble
  41. Osiris
  42. Berlex
  43. AstraZeneca
  44. Gene Logic
  45. Cerimon Pharmaceuticals
  46. Tioga Pharmaceuticals
  47. Serono
  48. Genentech
  49. Unity Pharmaceuticals
  50. Albireo Pharma
  51. Salix Pharmaceuticals
  52. Ore Pharmaceuticals
  53. Prometheus Therapeutics and Diagnostics
  54. Athersys
  55. Alba Therapeutics
  56. Axcan
  57. Funxional Therapeutics
  58. Gilead Sciences
  59. Nektar
  60. Wyeth
  61. Zealand Pharma
  62. Otsuka
  63. Boehringer Ingelheim
  64. Novartis
  65. Schering Canada
  66. Lesaffre
  67. Giuliani SPA
  68. Danisco
  69. Ocera Therapeutics
  70. Danone
  71. Roquette Pharma
  72. Mapi-Naxis
  73. Disphar
  74. AGI Therapeutics
  75. Albireo
  76. Alfa Wasserman
  77. Amgen
  78. AM-Pharma BV
  79. Anaphore
  80. Astellas
  81. Atlantic Healthcare
  82. Aptalis
  83. BioBalance
  84. Celek Pharmaceuticals
  85. Cellerix SL
  86. ChemoCentryx
  87. CoMentis
  88. Cosmo Technologies
  89. Coronado Biosciences
  90. Cytokine PharmaSciences
  91. Eagle Pharmaceuticals
  92. Eli Lilly
  93. EnteroMedics
  94. Exagen Diagnostics
  95. Flexion Therapeutics
  96. Genzyme
  97. Human Genome Sciences
  98. Ironwood Pharmaceuticals
  99. KaloBios Pharmaceuticals
  100. Lexicon Pharmaceuticals
  101. Lycera
  102. Meda Pharmaceuticals
  103. Merck Research Laboratories
  104. Merck Serono
  105. Nisshin Kyorin Pharmaceuticals
  106. NPS Pharmaceuticals
  107. Optimer Pharmaceuticals
  108. Orexigen Therapeutics
  109. Prometheus Laboratories
  110. ProtAb
  111. PurGenesis Technologies
  112. Relypsa
  113. Roche
  114. Salient Pharmaceuticals
  115. Shire Pharmaceuticals
  116. Sigmoid Pharma
  117. Sirtris Pharmaceuticals
  118. SLA Pharma UK
  119. Targacept
  120. Therakos
  121. TxCell SA
  122. Viamet Pharmaceuticals
  123. Vascular Biogenics
  124. Warner Chilcott UK
  125. Janssen
  126. Millennium/Takeda
  127. Genentech/Hoffman-La Roche
  128. Neovacs
  129. Merck/Serono
  130. Robarts
  131. Vifor
  132. Merck Sharp Dohme
  133. Alba
  134. VSL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Treatment of inflammatory bowel disease has greatly improved with the development of targeted, monoclonal antibody-based therapies. Tumor necrosis factor antagonists are frequently used to treat patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, but they have side effects and their efficacy often decreases with use. New, more effective drugs are therefore needed and in development. However, many agents that appeared to be promising in preclinical studies have failed to show efficacy in clinical trials. We discuss possible reasons for the failures of these reagents in trials, which include the high rate of response to placebo, an inadequate range of doses, inappropriate timing of end point measurements, the changing therapeutic environment, and the competitive trial system. We also review regulatory guidelines for end points and trial design and recommend ways to improve trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据