4.8 Article

BASIC-LIVER, PANCREAS, AND BILIARY TRACT

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 140, 期 3, 页码 987-U415

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.11.038

关键词

Alcohol Disease; Transcription Factors; ER Protein Folding; Organelle

资金

  1. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism [R21 AA016010]
  2. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine [1P01AT003960]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress responses (collectively known the unfolded protein response [UPR]) have important roles in several human disorders, but their contribution to alcoholic pancreatitis is not known. We investigated the role of X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1), a UPR regulator, in prevention of alcohol-induced ER stress in the exocrine pancreas. METHODS: Wild-type and Xbp1(+/-) mice were fed control or ethanol diets for 4 weeks. Pancreatic tissue samples were then examined by light and electron microscopy to determine pancreatic alterations; UPR regulators were analyzed biochemically. RESULTS: In wild-type mice, ethanol activated a UPR, increasing pancreatic levels of XBP1 and XBP1 targets such as protein disulfide isomerase (PDI). In these mice, pancreatic damage was minor. In ethanol-fed Xbp1(+/-) mice, XBP1 and PDI levels were significantly lower than in ethanol-fed-wild-type mice. The combination of XBP1 deficiency and ethanol feeding reduced expression of regulators of ER function and the up-regulation of proapoptotic signals. Moreover, ethanol feeding induced oxidation of PDI, which might compromise PDI-mediated disulfide bond formation during ER protein folding. In ethanol-fed Xbp1(+/-) mice, ER stress was associated with disorganized and dilated ER, loss of zymogen granules, accumulation of autophagic vacuoles, and increased acinar cell death. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term ethanol feeding causes oxidative ER stress, which activates a UPR and increases XBP1 levels and activity. A defective UPR due to XBP1 deficiency results in ER dysfunction and acinar cell pathology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据