4.8 Article

The Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome and Mismeasurement of Gastrin

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 140, 期 5, 页码 1444-1453

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.01.051

关键词

Diagnostic Assays; Gastrinoma; Antibody; Gastrin Quantitation

资金

  1. Danish Medical Research Council
  2. Danish Cancer Union
  3. Lundbeck Foundation
  4. Novo Nordisk Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) is characterized by hypersecretion of gastric acid, severe peptic ulcerations in the upper small intestine, and diarrhea. It is usually diagnosed by measuring increased levels of gastrin in plasma. METHODS: We examined the accuracy of commercial kits to measure gastrin (7 radioimmunoassays and 5 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays), using plasma from 40 patients suspected or known to have ZES. Each sample was analyzed using the 12 kits and a reference assay that measures bioactive gastrin in plasma, irrespective of size and amino acid derivatization. Known concentrations of peptides with identical sequences to circulating gastrins were also assessed by all assays. Molecular patterns in plasma from patients with ZES were examined by chromatography and monitored by kits that measure false-low or false-high concentrations of gastrin. RESULTS: Failure to diagnose gastrinomas has serious consequences. Four kits found false-low concentrations of gastrin in 20% to 80% of the patients. Specificity assessment showed that the antibodies used in these kits bound only gastrin-17. Three kits found false-high concentrations of gastrin, because the reagents had increased reactions to sulfated gastrins or to unspecific factors in plasma. Thus, only 5 of 12 kits tested accurately measure plasma concentrations of gastrin. CONCLUSIONS: Seven of 12 tested commercial kits inaccurately measure plasma concentrations of gastrin; these assays used antibodies with inappropriate specificity that were insufficiently validated. Misdiagnosis of gastrinoma based on lack of specificity of assays for gastrin results in ineffective or inappropriate therapy for patients with ZES.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据