4.8 Article

α Cell-Specific Men1 Ablation Triggers the Transdifferentiation of Glucagon-Expressing Cells and Insulinoma Development

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 138, 期 5, 页码 1954-U105

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.01.046

关键词

Men1 Ablation; Pancreatic alpha Cells; Transdifferentiation; Insulinoma

资金

  1. Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer [CZ4054, 1146]
  2. Ligue contre le Cancer de la Loire and du Rhone
  3. Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The tumor suppressor menin is recognized as a key regulator of pancreatic islet development, proliferation, and beta-cell function, whereas its role in alpha cells remains poorly understood. The purpose of the current study was to address this issue in relation to islet tumor histogenesis. METHODS: We generated alpha cell-specific Men1 mutant mice with Cre/loxP technology and carried out analyses of pancreatic lesions developed in the mutant mice during aging. RESULTS: We showed that, despite the alpha-cell specificity of the GluCre transgene, both glucagonomas and a large amount of insulinomas developed in mutant mice older than 6 months, accompanied by mixed islet tumors. Interestingly, the cells sharing characteristics of both alpha and beta cells were identified shortly after the appearance of menin-deficient alpha cells but well before the tumor onset. Using a genetic cell lineage tracing analysis, we demonstrated that insulinoma cells were directly derived from transdifferentiating glucagon-expressing cells. Furthermore, our data indicated that the expression of Pdx1, MafA, Pax4, and Ngn3 did not seem to be required for the initiation of this transdifferentiation. CONCLUSIONS: Our work shows cell transdifferentiation as a novel mechanism involved in islet tumor development and provides evidence showing that menin regulates the plasticity of differentiated pancreatic alpha cells in vivo, shedding new light on the mechanisms of islet tumorigenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据