4.8 Article

Effects of Attention on Visceral Stimulus Intensity Encoding in the Male Human Brain

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 135, 期 6, 页码 2065-2074

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.005

关键词

-

资金

  1. CRUK
  2. MIRC
  3. Medical Research Council [G0300195] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [G0300195] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims: Hypervigilance is considered important in pain perception in functional gastrointestinal disorders. Nonetheless, a comprehensive assessment of the influence of attention on brain processing of visceral sensation has not been performed. We investigated the effects of attention on esophageal pain perception and brain activity. Methods: Twelve healthy male volunteers (age range, 21-32 years) underwent 4 functional. magnetic resonance imaging scans incorporating 4 levels of esophageal stimulation (ES), ranging from nonpainful to painful, during which they completed a task aimed at distracting them from the esophageal stimulus. The volunteers were then scanned a fifth time, during painful stimulation without distraction. Results: Following ES during distraction, there was a significant linear trend (P < .05) in which the intensity of cerebral activation in the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) (bilateral) and left mid-anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) increased with stimulation intensity. When pain was delivered during distraction, there was a significant reduction in pain ratings, accompanied by significant decreases (P < .05) in brain activity in the right ACC and right prefrontal cortex. There was no effect of distraction on SI activity (P < .05). Conclusions: Our results suggest that the SI is involved in processing sensory-discriminative aspects of visceral sensation. In contrast, activity in the mid-ACC suggests that this region is multifunctional because it appears to be involved in sensory and cognitive appraisal of visceral pain; the right prefrontal cortex seems to be involved in only cognitive responses to pain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据