4.1 Article

Rescue therapy after Helicobacter pylori eradication failure

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 89-99

出版社

ELSEVIER DOYMA SL
DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2010.10.013

关键词

Helicobacter pylori; Rescue; Failure; Metronidazole; Clarithromycin; Levofloxacin; Rifabutin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the use of currently-recommended therapies, at least 20% of patients remain infected after a first attempt at Helicobacter pylori eradication. Therefore, when designing a therapeutic strategy, rather than focus exclusively on the result of the first eradication therapy, from the outset physicians should plan the sequence of consecutively administered combinations with the highest possibility of achieving a 100% success rate. The choice of rescue therapy depends on the drugs used in the first eradication attempt, since repeating the same antibiotic is not recommended. Systematic bacterial culture after a first H. pylori eradication failure does not seem to be required in clinical practice and this technique can be reserved for patients with a second failed attempt. There are several possibilities for empirical rescue therapy (without knowing the bacterial sensitivity). After failure of the combination of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin and clarithromycin the most widely used combination in Spain, quadruple therapy (PPI-bismuth-tetracycline-metronidazole) has been the most widely used treatment. More recently, levofloxacin (together with amoxicillin and a PPI) is as effective as quadruple therapy, or more so, and has the advantage of being simpler and better tolerated. In addition, rescue therapy with levofloxacin is a promising third-line alternative after failure of two eradication therapies containing key antibiotics such as amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole and tetracycline. Finally, rifabutin-based therapies have achieved promising results and are even effective in patients with multiple failures or multiple antibiotic resistance. (C) 2010 Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据