4.5 Article

Effects of adding a virtual reality environment to different modes of treadmill walking

期刊

GAIT & POSTURE
卷 39, 期 3, 页码 939-945

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.12.005

关键词

Biomechanics; Gait; Rehabilitation medicine; Self-paced

资金

  1. ZonMw, the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development [91112031]
  2. STW, Dutch technology foundation [10733]
  3. Motek Medical BV

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Differences in gait between overground and treadmill walking are suggested to result from imposed treadmill speed and lack of visual flow. To counteract this effect, feedback-controlled treadmills that allow the subject to control the belt speed along with an immersive virtual reality (VR) have recently been developed. We studied the effect of adding a VR during both fixed speed (FS) and self-paced (SP) treadmill walking. Nineteen subjects walked on a dual-belt instrumented treadmill with a simple endless road projected on a 1808 circular screen. A main effect of VR was found for hip flexion offset, peak hip extension, peak knee extension moment, knee flexion moment gain and ankle power during push off. A consistent interaction effect between VR and treadmill mode was found for 12 out of 30 parameters, although the differences were small and did not exceed 50% of the within subject stride variance. At FS, the VR seemed to slightly improve the walking pattern towards overground walking, with for example a 6.5 mm increase in stride length. At SP, gait became slightly more cautious by adding a VR, with a 9.1 mm decrease in stride length. Irrespective of treadmill mode, subjects rated walking with the VR as more similar to overground walking. In the context of clinical gait analysis, the effects of VR are too small to be relevant and are outweighed by the gains of adding a VR, such as a more stimulating experience and possibility of augmenting it by real-time feedback. (C) 2013 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据