4.5 Article

Repeatability and reproducibility of OSSCA, a functional approach for assessing the kinematics of the lower limb

期刊

GAIT & POSTURE
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 231-236

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.05.005

关键词

Functional gait analysis; SARA; SCoRE; OCST; OSSCA

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [SFB 760]
  2. EU [FP6 DeSSOS IST-027252]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Marker-based gait analysis of the lower limb that uses assumptions of generic anatomical morphology can be susceptible to errors, particularly in subjects with high levels of soft tissue coverage. We hypothesize that a functional approach for assessing skeletal kinematics, based on the application of techniques to reduce soft tissue artefact and functionally identify joint centres and axes, can more reliably (repeatably and reproducibly) assess the skeletal kinematics than a standard generic regression approach. Six healthy adults each performed 100 repetitions of a standardized motion, measured on four different days and by five different observers. Using OSSCA, a combination of functional approaches to reduce soft tissue artefact and identify joint centres and axes, the lengths of the femora and tibiae were determined to assess the inter-day and inter-observer reliability, and compared against a standard generic regression approach. The results indicate that the OSSCA was repeatable and reproducible (ICC lowest bound 0.87), but also provided an improvement over the regression approach (ICC lowest bound 0.69). Furthermore, the analysis of variance revealed a statistically significant variance for the factor observers (p < 0.01; low-reproducibility) when using the regression approach for determining the femoral lengths. Here, this non-invasive, rapid and robust approach has been demonstrated to allow the repeatable and reproducible identification of skeletal landmarks, which is insensitive to marker placement and measurement session. The reliability of the OSSCA thus allows its application in clinical studies for reducing the uncertainty of approach-induced systematic errors. (C) 2010 Elsevier By. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据